Skip to main content

We are currently upgrading our shopping cart; in the interim all orders are being diverted to Waterstones. If you would like to redeem a promotional code, or are an author wanting to place an order, please email us.

Contact us

Reconnoitring Russia

Like many European countries during the Great Age of Discovery and Exploration, Russia embarked on policies of state building, exploration and imperial expansion. At the beginning of the fourteenth century, the territory under Moscow’s control was about twenty thousand square kilometres. By 1800 Russia’s empire had expanded to some eighteen million square kilometres. Russia had thus become one of the world’s greatest empires.

By focusing on such geographical practices as exploring, observing, describing, mapping and similar activities, Reconnoitring Russia seeks to explain how Russia’s rulers and its educated public came to know and understand the territory of their expanding state and empire, especially as a result of the modernizing policies of such sovereigns as Peter the Great and Catherine the Great. It places the Russian experience into a comparative context, showing how that experience compares with those of other European countries over the same period. The book adopts a broad chronological framework, exploring the age between 1613 when the Romanov dynasty assumed power and 1825, the conclusion of Alexander I’s reign, or what is often termed the end of the ‘long eighteenth century’.

Praise for Reconnoitring Russia
Reconnoitring Russia is an original contribution to two fields of scholarship: history of geography as a science and practices of exploration, and the history of the Russian Empire. The author was one of the most devoted historians of the geography of Russia and this is the first comprehensive analysis of the development of geographical knowledge in the period under study to be published either in English or in Russian.’
Julia Lajus, Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in Social Sciences and Humanities (NIAS) in Amsterdam

‘There is no doubt that “the geographical exploration and survey of the vast spaces of Eurasia, pioneered by Russians, Germans and others, forms an important chapter in the history of European imperialism and of European geographical endeavour … all too frequently overlooked”… Shaw’s excellent book provides this hitherto-missing chapter.’
The Russian Review

Writing Resistance

In 1884, the first of 68 prisoners convicted of terrorism and revolutionary activity were transferred to a new maximum security prison at Shlissel´burg Fortress near St Petersburg. The regime of indeterminate sentences in isolation caused severe mental and physical deterioration among the prisoners, over half of whom died. But the survivors fought back to reform the prison and improve the inmates’ living conditions. The memoirs many survivors wrote enshrined their story in revolutionary mythology, and acted as an indictment of the Tsarist autocracy’s loss of moral authority.

Writing Resistance features three of these memoirs, all translated into English for the first time. They show the process of transforming the regime as a collaborative endeavour that resulted in flourishing allotments, workshops and intellectual culture – and in the inmates running many of the prison’s everyday functions. Sarah J. Young’s introductory essay analyses the Shlissel´burg memoirs’ construction of a collective narrative of resilience, resistance and renewal. It uses distant reading techniques to explore the communal values they inscribe, their adoption of a powerful group identity, and emphasis on overcoming the physical and psychological barriers of the prison.

The first extended study of Shlissel´burg’s revolutionary inmates in English, Writing Resistance uncovers an episode in the history of political imprisonment that bears comparison with the inmates of Robben Island in South Africa’s apartheid regime and the Maze Prison in Belfast during the Troubles. It will be of interest to scholars and students of the Russian revolution, carceral history, penal practice and behaviours, and prison and life writing.

Praise for Writing Resistance

‘The memoirs published by Young have not been republished in Russian since the 1920s, becoming a bibliographic rarity [and] the presentation of which to an English-speaking audience is an undoubted breakthrough in studying the history of the prisoners of the Shlisselburg Fortress.’
Cahiers d’histoire russe, est-européenne, caucasienne et centrasiatique

‘Convey[s] a sense of squandered human potential.’
The Times Literary Supplement (TLS)

‘An impressive study … Young’s expertise in Russian literature and language is reflected in her skilful translations capturing the many nuances, registers and special meanings of words used by the inmates. Like all history books that offer important and original translations of sources with a handy glossary and meticulous bibliography, this publication would be a welcome reference in any library. However, Young has produced a book for anyone interested in narratives about resistance, resilience and renewal.’
European History Quarterly

‘Young has made a great contribution to prison literature with her translations, and her work would be of interest to academicians, researchers and students who are interested in carceral life of political prisoners during the Soviet Union.’
International Journal of Russian Studies

‘Sarah Young has performed an exceptional service to the field of nineteenth-century studies by assembling this superb edition of three representative memoirs written by revolutionaries held in the Shlissel’burg prison under the Russian Empire’s last two tsars, Aleksandr III and Nikolai II….Writing Resistance is an exceptional collection that will interest anyone who works on radical movements, prison reform and carceral issues, or even women’s history in the nineteenth century. The collection raises important issues about the degree of continuity between nineteenth-century Russian carceral practices and the operations of the Soviet political confinement system.’
Nineteenth-Century Contexts

‘Sarah J. Young’s excellent collection of revolutionary memoirs from Shlissel’burg Prison provides a welcome addition to a range of scholarly fields, from history to carceral studies, translation and literature.’
Revolutionary Russia

Re-Mapping Centre and Periphery

Historians often assume a one-directional transmission of knowledge and ideas, leading to the establishment of spatial hierarchies defined as centres and peripheries. In recent decades, transnational and global history have contributed to a more inclusive understanding of intellectual and cultural exchanges that profoundly challenged the ways in which we draw our mental maps.

Covering the early modern and modern periods, Re-mapping Centre and Periphery investigates the asymmetrical and multi-directional structure of such encounters within Europe as well as in a global context. Exploring subjects from the shores of the Russian Empire to nation-making in Latin America, the international team of contributors demonstrates how, as products of human agency, centre and periphery are conditioned by mutual dependencies; rather than representing absolute categories of analysis, they are subjective constructions determined by a constantly changing discursive context.

Through its analysis, the volume develops and implements a conceptual framework for remapping centres and peripheries, based on conceptual history and discourse history. As such, it will appeal to a wide variety of historians, including transnational, cultural and intellectual, and historians of early modern and modern periods.

Praise for Re-mapping Centre and Periphery ‘… [A] fine examination and quantitative analysis of the meaning of metropolis by Tessa Hauswedell. … One of the strengths of the volume lies in its imaginative selection of cases that link these concerns to political, industrial, and agricultural modernisation, scientific, trade and municipal networks, nationalism and consumption, or the concepts of identity, margin and metropolis. … This collection of essays brings new insights into the multi-layered and challenging subject of centre and periphery. …The book thus makes a welcome contribution to ongoing efforts in the social and human sciences to “re-map centre and periphery”.’
Connections

Sign up to our newsletter

Don't miss out!
Subscribe to the UCL Press newsletter for the latest open access books,
journal CfPs, news and views from our authors and much more!